Compass Box Great King Street Artists Blend Review

blend_gre5Yes, I get it, blended whiskies are not inferior to their single malt counterparts. Looking back across time immemorial, I don’t think I ever jumped on that train. Johnnie Walker Black was one of the first whiskies I became acquainted with and I certainly enjoyed it then. Many blended whiskies later, my appreciation of the category has not abated. Upon learning about the usual production methods employed in blended whisky, however, you can’t say the naysayers don’t have some sort of argument. Blending in a flavorful single malt with neutral grain spirit doesn’t exactly rock my socks off compared to the provenance of the single malt compositions. I think it’s done to simply lower production costs and offer a competitive price for the consumer. And that is why blends command 90% of the market share.

Like I said earlier, I do not fight the blends vs. malts civil war. I fight other ones and my time is precious. John Glazer has established a premium, artisan approach to whisky blending with his company Compass Box, producing a variety of acclaimed blends for the shelf. One such blend is Compass Box Great King Street Artists Blend, and composite of 50% Lowland grain whisky aged in first fill bourbon oak, the rest from Speyside and Highland as single malts. It’s aged in a combination of first-fill sherry oak, oak barrels fitted with new charred French oak ends, and in first-fill bourbon oak. This arrangement already proclaims care and quality from the get go, along with no chill filtration or caramel coloring and is bottled at 43% ABV. Not a bad way to make a blend that costs little more than $40. On to it…

SWC Review

Nose- Perfumed botanicals with banana. Ripe pear, barley and citrus. Nice sweetness with vanilla.

Taste– Pear, spice and citrus rind. Peppery and sweet. Creamy mouthfeel.

Finish- Sweet crab apple and pine needles. Tart citrus. Nutmeg and oak tannins.

Comment- Won me over with time. Nice subtleties, pleasant drink. A quiet complexity with fantastic value for the money.

SWC Rating- 86/100

Agree? Disagree? Come at me.

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: